26th
Sometimes it’s best not to keep your cool.
In fact, hot-headed stock investors make better decisions, a study in the Academy of Management Journal showed.
… .
The conventional wisdom that emotions can make you irrational has less to do with how intense your feelings are than with how much you understand them, the study showed.
In other words, those investors who listened to their emotions were better able to regulate them.
I’m having a crisis of confidence, and I blame Jesus.
Actually, my crisis is not so much about Jesus as it is about the impending rapture, which I don’t necessarily believe will happen. But I don’t believe the rapture won’t happen, either; I really don’t see any evidence for (or against) either scenario. It all seems unlikely, but still plausible. Interestingly enough, I don’t think there is a word for my particular worldview: “Nihilism” means you don’t believe in anything, but I can’t find a word that describes partial belief in everything. “Paganism” is probably the closest candidate, but that seems too Druidesque for the style of philosophy I’m referring to. Some would claim that this is kind of like “agnosticism,” but true agnostics always seem too willing to side with the negative; they claim there are no answers, so they live as if those answers don’t exist. They’re really just nihilists without panache.
For Bakhtin, all language - indeed, all thought - appeared dialogic. This means that everything anybody ever says always exists in response to things that have been said before and in anticipation of things that will be said in response. We never, in other words, speak in a vacuum. As a result, all language (and the ideas which language contains and communicates) is dynamic, relational and engaged in a process of endless redescriptions of the world.
When scholars in France, the United States and United Kingdom in the 1970s and 1980s rediscovered Bakhtin’s work, it seemed to fit with the then-nascent concepts of “intertextuality”. European social psychologists also applied Bakhtin’s work to the study of human social experience, preferring it as a more dynamic alternative to Cartesian monologicality. More recently, many people have seen his concept of dialogism as especially relevant to the world of online interaction. Wikipedia in this light becomes an intensely dialogic phenomenon, doing away with the idea of knowledge as emanating from single, authoritative, closed (what Bakhtin would call ‘monologic’) sources and instead embracing the idea of knowledge as collective, relational and dynamic.